Context and Problem Statement

A skill’s folder name is not a label on the folder — it is the identifier, six times over: the name: frontmatter, the /ai-migration-kit:<name> invocation a user types, the evals/<name>-trigger-eval.json filename, an entry in each of two literal Python rosters (evals/run_all.py’s SKILLS and evals/trigger_eval.py’s DEFAULT_KNOWN), a row in the per-skill area: taxonomy that auto-dev slices worker isolation from, and the string every cross-referencing SKILL.md spells by hand. There is no indirection anywhere; tests/skills/check-frontmatter.py turns the coincidence into a contract by refusing a name: that differs from its folder and by asserting both rosters equal the skills/*/ folder set (#331).

The ten shipped skills were named three different ways at once. Six read as verb-object (create-issue, implement-issue, merge-pr, triage-backlog, setup-repo, auto-dev); the family members read as <family>-<role> (auto-dev-worker, auto-dev-merge; migrate, migrate-assess, migrate-audit, migrate-verify, migrate-followups). Four did neither: get-repo-profile was verb-object-object with a redundant get-; followups was a bare noun that collided in grep with scripts/followups.py and commands/migrate-followups.md; systematic-debugging named a style rather than a job; and legacy-upgrade was inverted and, worse, was the head of the migrate-* family that all four of its own commands are named after, so a contributor grepping migrate for the pipeline found the commands and the four siblings and missed the head. Because the name is the identifier and not a label, that inconsistency was not contained in one place: measured on main it spanned 53 files for legacy-upgrade, 49 each for get-repo-profile and followups, 19 for systematic-debugging. Two of the four also made the area: taxonomy contradict itself at the point where the isolation contract is read — area: migrate covered a folder called legacy-upgrade, area: repo-setup one called get-repo-profile.

Considered Options

• Do nothing, and document the inconsistency in ARCHITECTURE.md.
• Rename, and ship alias folders (or a name-map) so the old invocations keep resolving.
• Rename only legacy-upgrade — the one whose name actively misleads — and leave the other three.
• Rename all four, with no aliases, and record the naming rule itself.

Decision Outcome

Every folder under skills/ is named by one of exactly two rules — (1) a standalone skill is verb-object; (2) a member of a family is <family>-<role>, where <family> is itself a rule-1 name or the bare verb that heads the family — and the four non-compliant folders are renamed in the 2.0 breaking window with no aliases, shims, redirect folders or deprecation period (get-repo-profile → profile-repo, followups → review-followups, systematic-debugging → debug-issue, legacy-upgrade → migrate-legacy). Aliases lose on their own mechanics rather than on taste: check-frontmatter.py demands one evals/<name>-trigger-eval.json set and two roster entries per skills/*/ folder, so each alias would have to carry a duplicate eval set, and the trigger bench would then score two descriptions competing for the same queries — measurably worse than the inconsistency it papers over, and an alias is a second name for the same skill, which is the exact thing the rules exist to end.

Consequences

Renames happen only in a major. A skill name is a user-typed invocation and a filename in five machine-read places, so changing one is a breaking change; outside a major nobody schedules it on its own, which is how four offenders accumulated. This record makes the wait affordable rather than arbitrary: a future rule-breaking name is fixed at the next major, not argued about again from scratch, and the ADR is what a reviewer cites when a new skill is proposed under a third shape.

The rules also make the ten-skill list predictable rather than arbitrary. README.md and ARCHITECTURE.md now state the two rules and point here instead of explaining why four entries look different, and a reader who knows the family (migrate-*, auto-dev-*) can predict the folder name without opening skills/.

The cost is paid once, in this release, and it is real: every old invocation in a user’s muscle memory, notes or scripts stops resolving, with no error that suggests the new name. It is also paid inside the repo, since the name is spelled by hand in ~120 files — which is precisely the argument for making the sweep once, under one rule, rather than four separate times. Because the descriptions themselves are unchanged, a shift in the trigger bench after this lands is measurement noise rather than a regression, and is re-run before it is acted on (ADR-0007 keeps evals/run_all.py out of the worker fleet, so the owner runs it).